Sustainability Within the Brand:
Environmental Impact: Not Good Enough:
- Victoria’s Secret has achieved the E-label
- This is the lowest possible sustainability score and Victoria’s Secret has earned it by communicating nothing concrete about the policies for environment, carbon emissions of labor conditions in low-wage countries
Environmental Impact: Not Good Enough:
- Victoria’s Secret does not use eco-friendly materials in its collection, which is why its rating is ‘Not Good Enough’
- There is no evidence that it has greenhouse gas emissions reduction target
- Has set a deadline for the elimination of hazardous chemicals by 2020 and it complies with a Restricted Substances List
- The brand also has not set a specific reduction target, it reports to the Carbon Disclosure Project
- Based on the 2018 Ethical Fashion Report, the brands labour conditions were given a ‘Not Good Enough’ rating
- It has no worker empowerment initiatives such as collective bargaining or rights to make a complaint
- It traces some of its supply chain including proportion of the final stage of production, which is good, but it audits only a small proportion of its traced facilities
Overall Rating: 'Not Good Enough':
- Overall rating is not good enough based on its environmental impact and labour conditions
- The brand makes products that are generally free from animal materials
- To improve, the brand needs to incorporate more environmentally friendly materials in its designs, set specific reduction targets for water and gas emissions reduction as well as ensure its workers are paid a living wage
Comments
Post a Comment